In class we are watching a movie about Berlin and the part that became Communist. It was about a Stasi officer, which is a sercet police that watchs people in the eastern Gernmany a little after WWII ended. The Stasi in the movie was watching a couple, the male was a play writer. I found it interseting that one person would want to spend their life like that. Not having a good social life and having to do such a crool thing like that. I think that after the Holocaust the government in Gernmany should have learned their lesson. I dont under stand the politics well, but I think after everything at the time, they should not have Stasi.
I am lucky that I have never experienced this, or lived in a country with these rules. I think its weird that a person was spying on me and my family. The things that go on in a families home is private which is why we have a door, 4 sides of walls and a roof. It is no one else's business to what is happening in that home. I believe that Communist countries that spy on their citizens is disturbing, like watching them, going through that person home and listening to the conversations. There is a reason why a home is private, some of the stuff that is say in a home is meant to be there and not have people knowing what it was about. It would be different if they were on the street and they were speaking loudly but its still weird. I am so glad that I live in county that I don't have to worry about it. The government was intersected in that couple because the girl was an actress and the boy was a play writer. The play writters had to be watched because they didnt want some thing like didnt like about their country. They werent aloud to say what ever they wanted to say. The government put up like microphones and speakers to hear there conversations that were meant to be private.
The boss that is stalking the government gets so attacked to the couples life that he doesn't want to turn them in. He was letting them fly, he didn't turn them in. I can tell in this movie right now that the time of this and the place it took that the people were really wanted to re bell and didn't like it. I don't know what it feels like to not live in a free country, but it looks horrible. The boss doesn't really have a life outside of this job, he isn't social.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011
WWI
In class today, we talked at WWI, and the areas that the soldiers lived in. The area climate, that it rained so much that, since it is in the ground it becomes a mud pool. Filled with bloody bodies, rats, poop, pee, and other nasty things just piled into a long tube ditch under ground. I would never want to be in this situation, lets also add in that they sleep, ate, and lived in there for 24 hours every single day minus a few holidays. The soldiers had to adopt to their new home, a live a dangerous life. It was not like they were moving to a new home, they had to go from a roof to a filthy, disgusting, and unpleasant sight. Watching people die, I would never want to know what a died body smells like, but when I watched a movie last year for the holocaust they had their clothes over their mouth and noise.
Also that they don't have the things in life, like a garbage man. A garbage man, just doesn't come to the war sight to pick up the weekly garbage. Second, they didn't get any news papers to see what is going on, of the out side war zone. And third they knew their live was a risk.
And that they weren't really fighting for land, one side only lost around a few yards during so many years, while so many soldiers died. It really wasn't about the land, I think they were just mad at each other. The deasises and sickness that the soldiers got because of their boots, became old. They didn't have the choice of what shoes they wanted, they probably only had one pair. As "their"ditch became grosser, and the boots were being soaked up from the nasty water waste. Soldiers got a disease that starts on their feet but ran up their body to a organ to the heart and died. If they were not treated well. And now knowing that it eats your organs and die. I feel like that would be the worse way to die in war. In life the enviornment isn't always to our greatest.
Also that they don't have the things in life, like a garbage man. A garbage man, just doesn't come to the war sight to pick up the weekly garbage. Second, they didn't get any news papers to see what is going on, of the out side war zone. And third they knew their live was a risk.
And that they weren't really fighting for land, one side only lost around a few yards during so many years, while so many soldiers died. It really wasn't about the land, I think they were just mad at each other. The deasises and sickness that the soldiers got because of their boots, became old. They didn't have the choice of what shoes they wanted, they probably only had one pair. As "their"ditch became grosser, and the boots were being soaked up from the nasty water waste. Soldiers got a disease that starts on their feet but ran up their body to a organ to the heart and died. If they were not treated well. And now knowing that it eats your organs and die. I feel like that would be the worse way to die in war. In life the enviornment isn't always to our greatest.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Outline For Papar
Outline for History Paper
Social Effects of Haitian Earthquake
Topic: Social media is helpful in helping with disaster relief before, during, and after the earthquake in Haiti.
I. Introduction
A. Broad overview of the background information
B. Thesis statement
II. Body Paragraphs #1: How social media helps with being prepared before a
disaster hits a specific area.
III. Body Paragraphs #2: How social media helps with emergency response during a
disaster.
IV. Body Paragraphs #3: How social media helps with recovery following a
disaster – after immediate rescues and response, how do media sites help
with recovery?
V. Body Paragraphs #4: What are issues with social media/problems/drawbacks?
VI. Conclusion – Summary of main points/restate thesis
*All notes on peices of paper
Vulnerability
To what extent are we still vulnerable to our environment? In what ways are we protected from it?
If there was a heat wave a hundred years ago, many people would have suffered and died. Today, there does not seem to be such a reason for so many people to experience heath problems and death due to the environmental factors. Nearly every city building has air conditioning and heat, and there are warming and cooling centers in poor areas, or areas that have a lot of elderly people. Unfortunately, people still continue to suffer from extremes in the environment. If technology is so modern, then why do people still have side effects or die from heat or cold?
One reason for this may be that the city was not prepared for crisis like that, and they did not have enough safeguards to respond in time to his emergency. Also, citizens did not seem to be looking out for one another. Younger people should check in on elderly neighbors and family members to make sure that they are safe and comfortable. Finally, people were playing in fire hydrants and turning on city water, instead of saving it for true emergencies. The selfishness of some people most likely led to the sickness and death of others. I believe just like the mayor said was that people die every day, maybe the heat wave added a little bit. Poeple get sick, they faint. Trust me, I have done that so many times that I know what it feels like to be dizzy and not knowing where you are when you walk up. I have expenised this a lot more than other people at Parker, most people go to camps that dont live simipily, most people at Parker have never been in a situation were its 104 with no air conditioning.
I know what it feels like to be really hot when a heat wave has gone through Maine. At Camp Fernwood, there is no electricity or air condition or anything like that. So when its hot, the campers just have little fans. While my friends are at home and they have a heat wave but going on there computers or Tv and inside a air condition house. I have expenised this a lot more than other people at Parker, most people go to camps that dont live simipily, most people at Parker have never been in a situation were its 104 with no air conditioning.
One way that humans are really vulnerable to their enviorment is that humans depend on the enviornment that it provides us with the essential needs to survive in life. Humans are rewally fragile because they are so vulnerable to the enviorment that they live in.
If there was a heat wave a hundred years ago, many people would have suffered and died. Today, there does not seem to be such a reason for so many people to experience heath problems and death due to the environmental factors. Nearly every city building has air conditioning and heat, and there are warming and cooling centers in poor areas, or areas that have a lot of elderly people. Unfortunately, people still continue to suffer from extremes in the environment. If technology is so modern, then why do people still have side effects or die from heat or cold?
One reason for this may be that the city was not prepared for crisis like that, and they did not have enough safeguards to respond in time to his emergency. Also, citizens did not seem to be looking out for one another. Younger people should check in on elderly neighbors and family members to make sure that they are safe and comfortable. Finally, people were playing in fire hydrants and turning on city water, instead of saving it for true emergencies. The selfishness of some people most likely led to the sickness and death of others. I believe just like the mayor said was that people die every day, maybe the heat wave added a little bit. Poeple get sick, they faint. Trust me, I have done that so many times that I know what it feels like to be dizzy and not knowing where you are when you walk up. I have expenised this a lot more than other people at Parker, most people go to camps that dont live simipily, most people at Parker have never been in a situation were its 104 with no air conditioning.
I know what it feels like to be really hot when a heat wave has gone through Maine. At Camp Fernwood, there is no electricity or air condition or anything like that. So when its hot, the campers just have little fans. While my friends are at home and they have a heat wave but going on there computers or Tv and inside a air condition house. I have expenised this a lot more than other people at Parker, most people go to camps that dont live simipily, most people at Parker have never been in a situation were its 104 with no air conditioning.
One way that humans are really vulnerable to their enviorment is that humans depend on the enviornment that it provides us with the essential needs to survive in life. Humans are rewally fragile because they are so vulnerable to the enviorment that they live in.
Friday, November 11, 2011
Black Death
Why was the infection, able to spread that quickly?
When I think about the Black Death, I think about Swine Flu. Because that's all I have experienced with a sickness that is air born other than colds. In class when it started with one person and then spread it to two people and then a dimio effect after that. Every one in the class was hit other than the people that ended up with a better system. But with the difference of a plague now and back then was that we have more knowledge of medicine. Also we have better hygiene now. If something like Swine Flu wasn't able to be cured a lot of the population would have died. Also that people now have better hygiene so they were stronger and it didn't wipe out as many people. They was also a medicine to prevent it for people to get sick, if there was the knowledge of having medicine, the population of the world would really affect today.
How people reacted to the Black Death:
The Black Death was a huge outbreak, that took place around Europe in the mid 13th century. The plagues symptoms were like little black lumps on the body. Historians said that it spread because of rats, maybe a sneeze that would be air born that would be with a terrifying quick speed, and spread from open sores that were in contact of people. In class we discussed the fear of the disease and why so many people moved and left there city. Because they didn't know they had the disease when they fleeted their town they would get side affects and give them to other towns when they moved.
There was no medical knowledge in Europe to cope with the plague. No one could help with the towns that had been hit by the plague because they would get it too. The no knowledge for medicine wouldn't help any of the towns that was strucked with the bubonic plague. The Black Death had a huge impact on society sense it wiped out 2/3 of the population of Europe.
Why did the bubonic plague spread so quickly?
In the mid 13 century people lived in towns that were really close together but they had no idea of what a contagious disease is. And that they didn't know where to put the bodies after they died, and they put hem in the street not knowing that they would have been still contagious.
When I think about the Black Death, I think about Swine Flu. Because that's all I have experienced with a sickness that is air born other than colds. In class when it started with one person and then spread it to two people and then a dimio effect after that. Every one in the class was hit other than the people that ended up with a better system. But with the difference of a plague now and back then was that we have more knowledge of medicine. Also we have better hygiene now. If something like Swine Flu wasn't able to be cured a lot of the population would have died. Also that people now have better hygiene so they were stronger and it didn't wipe out as many people. They was also a medicine to prevent it for people to get sick, if there was the knowledge of having medicine, the population of the world would really affect today.
How people reacted to the Black Death:
The Black Death was a huge outbreak, that took place around Europe in the mid 13th century. The plagues symptoms were like little black lumps on the body. Historians said that it spread because of rats, maybe a sneeze that would be air born that would be with a terrifying quick speed, and spread from open sores that were in contact of people. In class we discussed the fear of the disease and why so many people moved and left there city. Because they didn't know they had the disease when they fleeted their town they would get side affects and give them to other towns when they moved.
There was no medical knowledge in Europe to cope with the plague. No one could help with the towns that had been hit by the plague because they would get it too. The no knowledge for medicine wouldn't help any of the towns that was strucked with the bubonic plague. The Black Death had a huge impact on society sense it wiped out 2/3 of the population of Europe.
Why did the bubonic plague spread so quickly?
In the mid 13 century people lived in towns that were really close together but they had no idea of what a contagious disease is. And that they didn't know where to put the bodies after they died, and they put hem in the street not knowing that they would have been still contagious.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Taking A Chance
During class, we were discussing about taking a chance when going from Spain, Italy or other counties to America. The people that did that was taking a chance, so they would get alot of money. You, have to be a cerrent type of person to risk your life. I know that I hate oceans, I would never do something like it. But back then, they didnt have the knowledge to know how far they were going and how long it was going to take. They could run into pirates, sink (which is my worst nightmare), or strong winds and they have to go back.
Why could anybody take a chance to die?
They were in boats that aren't the same as today. Made of wood and wouldnt the wind like snap the boat in half. I would rather be poor than take a chance to make money. I like to explore a new country, but I hate flying over bodies of water, with the techonlogy today it is really safe. But I would never ever sail across the huge ocean, not knowing what is in front of you and the chanalges that are ahead. There are sharks, hurricanes, winds and other things that could affect the boat and how it would change the sailing. In a blink of an eye, your boat could be around little currents and others could be with huge winds. If I wanted to said across the ocean, how would I know where I was going? If I was trying to end up in France, I would maybe end up in Morocco. I am not really a person that is taking a chance, I like to know that I will live a long life. Kind of like the world ending, those takes scare me. I would never want to be in that postion.
Given that Chistopher Columbus ended up in a island. Was luck, even though he didnt get were he was going to India but ended up running into American. The game we played in class, it is so hard to get across the sea, the three groups, no group was able to get across. Which tells you, its just luck. There is no way or knowing if they were going to make it. Like playing black jack, you put in 3 chips but only getting 1 back. Its luck. You will never know. There was no way of knowing.
Why could anybody take a chance to die?
They were in boats that aren't the same as today. Made of wood and wouldnt the wind like snap the boat in half. I would rather be poor than take a chance to make money. I like to explore a new country, but I hate flying over bodies of water, with the techonlogy today it is really safe. But I would never ever sail across the huge ocean, not knowing what is in front of you and the chanalges that are ahead. There are sharks, hurricanes, winds and other things that could affect the boat and how it would change the sailing. In a blink of an eye, your boat could be around little currents and others could be with huge winds. If I wanted to said across the ocean, how would I know where I was going? If I was trying to end up in France, I would maybe end up in Morocco. I am not really a person that is taking a chance, I like to know that I will live a long life. Kind of like the world ending, those takes scare me. I would never want to be in that postion.
Given that Chistopher Columbus ended up in a island. Was luck, even though he didnt get were he was going to India but ended up running into American. The game we played in class, it is so hard to get across the sea, the three groups, no group was able to get across. Which tells you, its just luck. There is no way or knowing if they were going to make it. Like playing black jack, you put in 3 chips but only getting 1 back. Its luck. You will never know. There was no way of knowing.
P.A.P.E.R Black Death
Purpose-
*The Black Death and bad effects for their societies and mostly Florence
Argument-
*There was no cure for the plague, terrible, and hard to not spread
Presuppositons-
*Not the knowledge of medicine
*Air born
*That God was doing this
Epistemology-
*Sympotoms
*Truth
*Dieing
*Spreading
Relate-
*Sounds right from other readings about the Black Death
*From the spreading and what happened it sounded like it was very true
*The Black Death and bad effects for their societies and mostly Florence
Argument-
*There was no cure for the plague, terrible, and hard to not spread
Presuppositons-
*Not the knowledge of medicine
*Air born
*That God was doing this
Epistemology-
*Sympotoms
*Truth
*Dieing
*Spreading
Relate-
*Sounds right from other readings about the Black Death
*From the spreading and what happened it sounded like it was very true
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Push and Pull
When people move out of their society it is either from a push or pull effect. The push effect is when conditions can be very bad and push people at of their homes. Pull factor is when they get pulled to a different society. They want to do it, its not forced like the push factor. Like walking against the wind it's difficult situation, its hard just like the push factor its a difficult place to be. But if you are walking and the wind is pushing your back, it is easier so its like the pull factor, its better than the push.
When people are pushed out of there home town is when they have to move away. Maybe from a natural disaster. Most people without a live or death move don't just move because they want to, if its a push. Its like a revolving door. One way out the other way in, and that is revolving doors in circles and at the exit you should exit for safety. A lot of the people that are in a push for an exit can be benfitful or be bad. Its a two way street, if the environment acts upon a one way street, you have to make the best of it and be positive.
The pull factor is when humans want to leave their home town to go to maybe a better advance society. For better jobs, personal, environment is better. They want to be pulled into that society to fill a better life, than where they are living now. If you live in a poor country and want to move, to a better country like United States of America, maybe for a better life for their family and maybe the economy is better. But the problem is that in the pull factor sometimes they don't make enough money to move. Maybe the currency is down and you think you get 100 dollars but really only getting 50 dollars because that's what the worth is at the time. Its difficult for both the push and pull situation.
For the economic factor, people are leaving home to find better jobs, they pull people in. Like a store window, pulling people into the nice things. Employment opportunities that are developed for a lot of jobs it pulls people in so that they can support their family. But that there was an increasing job rate, causing people to loose their jobs are pushing people to move.
Also personal factor for better schools, may be in other countries with more opportunities. I think that's the major pull factor of personal. Or to pull families closer to where their relatives may live. I believe that there is a push and pull situation for everything way people move, there is a down side and an up side.
For Environment, natural disasters are the main causes that people live to be pushed. They have to leave because it is unsafe and due to damage of there town also lack of food and water. But with natural disasters there is also a pull factor because of shelters that may have all the things on the bottom of the hierarchy of needs pyramid.
When people are pushed out of there home town is when they have to move away. Maybe from a natural disaster. Most people without a live or death move don't just move because they want to, if its a push. Its like a revolving door. One way out the other way in, and that is revolving doors in circles and at the exit you should exit for safety. A lot of the people that are in a push for an exit can be benfitful or be bad. Its a two way street, if the environment acts upon a one way street, you have to make the best of it and be positive.
The pull factor is when humans want to leave their home town to go to maybe a better advance society. For better jobs, personal, environment is better. They want to be pulled into that society to fill a better life, than where they are living now. If you live in a poor country and want to move, to a better country like United States of America, maybe for a better life for their family and maybe the economy is better. But the problem is that in the pull factor sometimes they don't make enough money to move. Maybe the currency is down and you think you get 100 dollars but really only getting 50 dollars because that's what the worth is at the time. Its difficult for both the push and pull situation.
For the economic factor, people are leaving home to find better jobs, they pull people in. Like a store window, pulling people into the nice things. Employment opportunities that are developed for a lot of jobs it pulls people in so that they can support their family. But that there was an increasing job rate, causing people to loose their jobs are pushing people to move.
Also personal factor for better schools, may be in other countries with more opportunities. I think that's the major pull factor of personal. Or to pull families closer to where their relatives may live. I believe that there is a push and pull situation for everything way people move, there is a down side and an up side.
For Environment, natural disasters are the main causes that people live to be pushed. They have to leave because it is unsafe and due to damage of there town also lack of food and water. But with natural disasters there is also a pull factor because of shelters that may have all the things on the bottom of the hierarchy of needs pyramid.
How it Changed Humans Interacting WIth Each Other
How did the exploration of the Americas change the world?
The exploration to America really changed the world because it changed how humans interacted to the environment. Here are a few thing thats changed the world because of the expoloration of America landscape of the world that humans knew about. Second, it changed the population, plant, and animal life. They didnt really know the structure of the earth before Christor Columbus found America, but the truth is that there were already humans there. He just showed the world that there was another huge island type thing. There was no knowledge of what they knew what the world looked like, they thought that it was flat but it was really a circle. The founding of America was really just a beinging of knowing the globe and where they really live. They expanded the knowledge of America and Europe and the rest of the world and because of all there journies from both sides of the huge ocean, everyone become more aware of other cultures.
It changed how the map looked. New land was discovered and the Europians mapped the new world and what they discovered. With all the good things that changed the world there was also some bad confliets too, like diseases because people from Europe werent amounded for it. Or the Americans weren't amounded for the diseases by the Europians.
The techonology changed the world. What if the Europians never exploration the Americans, would the world be the same? Were the Europians bringing a advanced culture to the places that they explored? The Europians were able to discover the power of humans and how they could control the world around them. The techonloogy developments in that time period made it possible to explore the new world. It changed the economic, social impact, politiccal, and religious. It really effected how the humans interacted with each other societies, because they probalby wanted the new peice of land, with goodies and teasures to find.
The exploration to America really changed the world because it changed how humans interacted to the environment. Here are a few thing thats changed the world because of the expoloration of America landscape of the world that humans knew about. Second, it changed the population, plant, and animal life. They didnt really know the structure of the earth before Christor Columbus found America, but the truth is that there were already humans there. He just showed the world that there was another huge island type thing. There was no knowledge of what they knew what the world looked like, they thought that it was flat but it was really a circle. The founding of America was really just a beinging of knowing the globe and where they really live. They expanded the knowledge of America and Europe and the rest of the world and because of all there journies from both sides of the huge ocean, everyone become more aware of other cultures.
It changed how the map looked. New land was discovered and the Europians mapped the new world and what they discovered. With all the good things that changed the world there was also some bad confliets too, like diseases because people from Europe werent amounded for it. Or the Americans weren't amounded for the diseases by the Europians.
The techonology changed the world. What if the Europians never exploration the Americans, would the world be the same? Were the Europians bringing a advanced culture to the places that they explored? The Europians were able to discover the power of humans and how they could control the world around them. The techonloogy developments in that time period made it possible to explore the new world. It changed the economic, social impact, politiccal, and religious. It really effected how the humans interacted with each other societies, because they probalby wanted the new peice of land, with goodies and teasures to find.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Why do people move?
Why do people move?
Some people move because they can, and some people move because they have to for reasons related to survival. Many Americans dream of retiring to warmer or cooler places, depending on where they have lived their whole lives. They work hard and save money so that one day they can retire to a climate of their choosing. Or, people move to live closer to their families. Unfortunately, in the current American economy, it is becoming more difficult for people to retire because they have lost so much of their savings and can no longer retire where and when they want. Moving becomes less of a choice and starts to become something people have to do in order to survive.
Survival seems to be a significant reason that people move. One way to look at survival is households moving to provide a better life for their families. This might mean moving where better jobs are, or if there is a job offering in a place that is unfamiliar but may be better. This would allow people to provide basic needs to their families like food, shelter, and clothing. There are other cases of moving for survival that are even more life saving than switching jobs. For instance, in cases of natural distasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, etc., people may have to move because they are not safe or do not have access to food or clean water, in addition safe housing. Or if humans, use all the amount of resources and there is nothing left. They have to more on to the next place. What would happen, if that was the case for all parts of the world? What would there be left, how would people coap with it? If that would ever happen that would be in many years to come. Just like there was societies back then, were they used all there natural surrounding like trees, and animals. If humans use the earth and did not chew it up, and use everything, there would be better societies and a better envioroment.
Many people move from poor countries to countries that have more opportunities. Some people immigrate to the United States to pursue the American Dream. They have the impression that by coming to this country, they can make a lot of money and live out their dreams that they may not be able to pursue in their own countries. However, many times, immigrants move here and find they cannot get jobs and they are just as poor and undereducated as they were in their own countries. On top of this many of them cannot have the opportunities to get good jobs because they don't speak the language.
Some people move because they can, and some people move because they have to for reasons related to survival. Many Americans dream of retiring to warmer or cooler places, depending on where they have lived their whole lives. They work hard and save money so that one day they can retire to a climate of their choosing. Or, people move to live closer to their families. Unfortunately, in the current American economy, it is becoming more difficult for people to retire because they have lost so much of their savings and can no longer retire where and when they want. Moving becomes less of a choice and starts to become something people have to do in order to survive.
Survival seems to be a significant reason that people move. One way to look at survival is households moving to provide a better life for their families. This might mean moving where better jobs are, or if there is a job offering in a place that is unfamiliar but may be better. This would allow people to provide basic needs to their families like food, shelter, and clothing. There are other cases of moving for survival that are even more life saving than switching jobs. For instance, in cases of natural distasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, etc., people may have to move because they are not safe or do not have access to food or clean water, in addition safe housing. Or if humans, use all the amount of resources and there is nothing left. They have to more on to the next place. What would happen, if that was the case for all parts of the world? What would there be left, how would people coap with it? If that would ever happen that would be in many years to come. Just like there was societies back then, were they used all there natural surrounding like trees, and animals. If humans use the earth and did not chew it up, and use everything, there would be better societies and a better envioroment.
Many people move from poor countries to countries that have more opportunities. Some people immigrate to the United States to pursue the American Dream. They have the impression that by coming to this country, they can make a lot of money and live out their dreams that they may not be able to pursue in their own countries. However, many times, immigrants move here and find they cannot get jobs and they are just as poor and undereducated as they were in their own countries. On top of this many of them cannot have the opportunities to get good jobs because they don't speak the language.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Biblography
Collier, Paul, and Jean-Louis Warnholz. "Haiti Earthquake: Social and Economic Fabric Must Be Rebuilt, Too, World News, The Guardian." Latest News, Sport and Comment from the Guardian, The Guardian. Web. 30 Oct. 2011
Connell, C. (2011). Earth shattering. International Educator, 20(1), 22-22-31. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/845252406?accountid=3360
Haiti: Social networks offer news, and comfort (2010). . United States, New York: Global Information Network. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/457553271?accountid=3360
Japan, and the critical three ways social media plays during a crisis (2011). United States, New York: PR Newswire Association LLC. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/858021694?accountid=3360.
James, E. C. (2011). Haiti, insecurity, and the politics of asylum. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 25(3), 357. Retrieved from
Due to social, political, and economic issues in Haiti, people wanted to leave that country and move elsewhere, including the U.S. How did this affect the social structure of Haiti?
McKibben, S. (2010). Rallying for haiti. Principal Leadership, 10(7), 80-80. Retrieve from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216292461?accountid=3360
McNulty, B. (2011). The education of poverty: Rebuilding haiti's school system after its "total collapse". The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 35(1), 109-109-126. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/860074807?accountid=3360
Merchant, R. M., Elmer, S., & Lurie, N. (2011). Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. The New England Journal of Medicine, 365(4), 289-289-291. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/879793921?accountid=3360.
No 'hope for haiti' without justice. (2010, Jan 19). Aljazeera.Net, pp. n/a. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/431336956?accountid=3360
Press. (2010, </span>). Haiti massive earthquake exacerbates nation's economic, environmental and social woes.Evansville Courier & Press (2007-Current), pp. A.13. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/743849165?accountid=3360
rents." International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) - Home. Web. 30 Oct. 2011. <http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/interview/2011/haiti-interview-2011-01-06.htm>.
Saturday, Last. "Terrible Effects of Earthquake in Haiti." Welcome to Third World Network (TWN). Web. 30 Oct. 2011. <http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/gtrends/gtrends282.htm>.
Schiller, K. (2011). Disaster response. Information Today, 28(5), 1 1,39-40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/865376436?accountid=3360.
Smith, B. G. (2010). Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 329. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/762306309?accountid=3360.
Social media helping connect victims and raise money for Haiti earthquake relief (2010). United States, Dallas: Newstex. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/189659600?accountid=3360.
Timpane, J. (2010). Social media a lifeline after quake struck: A post,
a tweet, a text from haiti was often the only way those affected
could reach out. United States, Washington: McClatchy - Tribune Information Services. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/458855525?accountid=3360.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)