One of our readings this week was about the
Twelve Tables, which was written by the Romans when they wrote their laws on
big bronze tables about rights and human rights. A lot of the rights written were still kind
of modern because some of them lasted over 2000 years. Like woman do not have human rights that
changed around 1850 ish. These tables of
laws were a lot different then the laws of Hammurabi's Code, that code of law
was a lot more strict and said "shall be put on death" these laws
written by the Romans were not a strict they were like a middle ground it was
more of a balance. Like one of the laws
were about if owing people money if did not pay had to go to court if then
still cant pay go to jail and then increasing got worse unlike Hammurabi’s Code
it was if cant pay then that person just gets put on death without a second
chance. I also noticed that the tone of
the Twelve Tables were softer and would not really scare people. There were some laws I did not care for in
the Twelve Tables like the woman have no rights and that the father has to
right by the law to own his children and can do whatever he wants to do to
them. Like beating them, making them
work and also killing them it is legal for the father to do that. And I just do not think that is right. This reminds me of abuse but now its
illegal.
Why do the Twelve Tables signify a concept of
"rights?" What makes this an important historical moment?
This
was a major jump-start to the history of laws; people knew what their
punishment would be. Also the tables
showed the citizens the life of property and what their property was including
woman. Unlike Hammurabi's code its more
a nicer tone. This is an important
historical document because it had included human rights towards the
people. Unlike Hammurabi's code it was
filled with punishments towards the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment